Portugal—1882 Treaty of Friendship and Commerce

Portugal Treaty

On May 5, 1882, a Provisional Convention was signed between Portugal and the Hawaiian Kingdom in Lisbon and thereafter ratified by both governments. Article I of this convention provides:

“the Consular Agents, the subjects, the ships and products of the soil, or of the industry of one of the two countries, will enjoy on the territory of the other the same exemptions, privileges, and immunities which other Consular Agents, subjects, ships and products of the soil, or of the industry of the most favored nation, enjoy.”

Neither Portugal nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this Provisional Convention in accordance with the principles of customary international law.  Therefore, this Portuguese Provisional Convention is still in full force and continues to have legal effect to date. Former Portuguese territories, which acquired their independence from Portugal, are successor States to, at the very least, Article I of the Hawaiian-Portuguese Treaty with regard to the citizenry of the successor State that effectively replaced the citizenry of the predecessor State in the treaty. These successor States are:

  1. Angola.  Independence:  November 11, 1975.
  2. Cape Verde.  Independence:  July 5, 1975.
  3. Guinea-Bissau.  Independence:  September 24, 1973.
  4. Mozambique.  Independence:  June 25, 1975.
  5. Sao Tome and Principe.  Independence:  July 12, 1975.
  6. Timor-Leste. Independence: November 28, 1975. May 20, 2002 is the official date of international recognition of Timor-Leste’s independence by the United Nations.

Netherlands-Luxembourg—1862 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation

Dutch Treaty

On October 16, 1862, a Treaty was signed between the Netherlands and the Hawaiian Kingdom in The Hague and thereafter ratified by both governments. The King of the Netherlands, William III, was also Grand Duke of Luxembourg. Article II of this treaty provides:

“the respective subjects of the two high contracting parties shall be perfectly and in all respects assimilated on their establishment and settlement, whether for a longer or shorter time in the States and Colonies of the other party on the terms granted to the subjects of the most favored nation in all which concerns the permission of sojourning, the exercise of legal professions, imposts, taxes, in a word, all the conditions relative to sojourn and establishment.”

Neither the Netherlands nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this treaty in accordance with the terms of Article VI of the 1862 Treaty.  Therefore, this treaty is still in full force and continues to have legal effect to date. Former Dutch territories, which acquired their independence from the Netherlands, are successor States to, at the very least, Article II of the Hawaiian-Dutch Treaty with regard to the citizenry of the successor State that effectively replaced the citizenry of the predecessor State in the treaty. These successor States are:

  1. Indonesia.  Independence:  August 17, 1945.
  2. Suriname.  Independence:  November 25, 1975.

Japan—1871 Treaty of Amity and Commerce

Japan Treaty

On August 19, 1871, a Treaty was signed between Japan and the Hawaiian Kingdom in the city of Yedo and thereafter ratified by both governments. Article II of this treaty provides:

“the subjects of each of the two high contracting parties, respectively, shall have the liberty freely and securely to come with their ships and cargoes to all places, ports and rivers in the territories of the other, where trade with other nations is permitted;  they may remain and reside in any such ports, and places respectively, and hire and occupy houses and warehouses, and may trade in all kinds of produce, manufactures and merchandise of lawful commerce, enjoying at all times the same privileges as may have been, or may hereafter be granted to the citizens or subjects of any other nation, paying at all times such duties and taxes as may be exacted from the citizens or subjects of other nations doing business or residing within the territories of each of the high contracting parties.”

Neither Japan nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this treaty in accordance with the terms of Article VI of the 1871 Treaty.  Therefore, this treaty is still in full force and continues to have legal effect to date. Former Japanese territories, which acquired their independence from Japan, are successor States to, at the very least, Article II of the Hawaiian-Japanese Treaty with regard to the citizenry of the successor State that effectively replaced the citizenry of the predecessor State in the treaty. The successor States are:

  1. North Korea.  Independence:  August 15, 1945.
  2. South Korea. Independence: August 15, 1945.

Italy—1863 Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation

Italy Treaty

On July 22, 1863, a Treaty was signed between Italy and the Hawaiian Kingdom in Paris and thereafter ratified by both governments. Article IV of this treaty provides:

“the respective citizens of the two countries shall enjoy the most constant and complete protection for their persons and property.  Consequently, they shall have free and easy access to the courts of justice in the pursuit and defense of their rights, in every instance and degree of jurisdiction established by the laws.”

Neither Italy nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this treaty in accordance with the terms of Article XXVII of the 1863 Treaty.  Therefore, this treaty is still in full force and continues to have legal effect to date. Former Italian territories, which acquired their independence from Italy, are successor States to, at the very least, Article IV of the Hawaiian-Italian Treaty with regard to the citizenry of the successor State that effectively replaced the citizenry of the predecessor State in the treaty. The successor State is:

  1. Libya.  Independence:  December 24, 1951.
  2. Somalia.  Independence:  July 1, 1960, from a merger of British Somaliland that became independent from the United Kingdom on 26 June 1960 and Italian Somaliland that became independent from the Italian-administered UN trusteeship on 1 July 1960 to form the Somali Republic.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Island—1851 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation

British Treaty

On July 10, 1851, a Treaty was signed between the United Kingdom and the Hawaiian Kingdom in Honolulu and thereafter ratified by both governments. Article VIII of this treaty provides:

“the subjects of either of the contracting parties, in the territories of the other, shall receive and enjoy full and perfect protection for their persons and property, and shall have free and open access to the courts of justice in the said countries, respectively, for the prosecution and defense of their just rights…”

Neither Great Britain nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this treaty in accordance with the principles of customary international law.  Therefore, this treaty is still in full force and continues to have legal effect to date. Former British territories, which acquired their independence from Great Britain, are successor States to, at the very least, Article VIII of the Hawaiian-British Treaty with regard to the citizenry of the successor State that effectively replaced the citizenry of the predecessor State in the treaty. These successor States, which includes mandate territories, are:

  1. Afghanistan.  Independence:  August 19, 1919.
  2. Antigua and Barbuda.  Independence:  November 1, 1981.
  3. Australia.  Independence:  January 1, 1901.
  4. Bahamas.  Independence:  July 10, 1973.
  5. Bahrain.  Independence:  August 15, 1971.
  6. Bangladesh.  Independence from Pakistan on December 16, 1971.  Pakistan acquired Independence from Great Britain on August 14, 1947.
  7. Barbados.  Independence:  November 30, 1966.
  8. Belize.  Independence:  September 21, 1981.
  9. Bhutan.  Independence from India on August 8, 1949.  India acquired Independence from Great Britain on August 15, 1947.
  10. Botswana.  Independence:  September 30, 1966.
  11. Brunei Darussalam. Independence: January 1, 1984.
  12. Canada. Independence: December 11, 1931.
  13. Cyprus.  Independence:  August 16, 1960.
  14. Dominica.  Independence:  November 3, 1978.
  15. Egypt.  Independence:  February 28, 1922.
  16. Fiji.  Independence:  October 10, 1970.
  17. Gambia.  Independence:  February18, 1965.
  18. Ghana.  Independence:  March 6, 1957.
  19. Grenada.  Independence:  February 7, 1974.
  20. Guyana.  Independence:  May 26, 1966.
  21. India.  Independence:  August 15, 1947.
  22. Iraq. Independence from British Mandate: October 3, 1932.
  23. Ireland.  Independence:  December 6, 1921.
  24. Israel. Independence from British Mandate: May 14, 1948.
  25. Jamaica.  Independence:  August 6, 1962.
  26. Jordan. Independence from British Mandate: May 25, 1946.
  27. Kenya.  Independence:  December 12, 1963.
  28. Kiribati.  Independence:  July 12, 1979.
  29. Kuwait.  Independence:  June 19, 1961.
  30. Lesotho.  Independence:  October 4, 1966.
  31. Malawi.  Independence:  July 6, 1964.
  32. Malaysia.  Independence:  August 31, 1957.
  33. Maldives.  Independence:  July 26, 1965.
  34. Malta.  Independence:  September 21, 1964.
  35. Mauritius.  Independence:  March 12, 1968.
  36. Myanmar.  Independence:  January 4, 1948.
  37. Namibia.  Independence from South African Mandate on March 21, 1990. South Africa acquired Independence from Great Britain on May 31, 1910.
  38. Nauru. Independence from Australia, New Zealand and Great Britain Trusteeship on January 31, 1968. New Zealand acquired Independence from Great Britain on September 26, 1907, and Australia acquired Independence from Great Britain on January 1, 1901.
  39. New Zealand.  Independence:  September 26, 1907.
  40. Nigeria.  Independence:  October 1, 1960.
  41. Pakistan.  Independence:  August 14, 1947.
  42. Papua New Guinea. Independence from Australian Trusteeship on September 16, 1975. Australia acquired Independence from Great Britain on January 1, 1901.
  43. Qatar.  Independence:  September 3, 1971.
  44. Saint Kitts and Nevis.  Independence:  September 19, 1983.
  45. Saint Lucia.  Independence:  February 22, 1979.
  46. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.  Independence:  October 27, 1979.
  47. Samoa. Independence from New Zealand Trusteeship on January 1, 1962. New Zealand acquired Independence from Great Britain on September 26, 1907.
  48. Seychelles.  Independence:  June 29, 1976.
  49. Sierra Leone.  Independence:  April 27, 1961.
  50. Singapore.  Independence from Malaysia on August 9, 1965. Malaysia acquired Independence from Great Britain on August 31, 1957.
  51. Solomon Islands.  Independence:  July 7, 1978.
  52. Somalia.  Independence:  July 1, 1960, from a merger of British Somaliland that became independent from the UK on 26 June 1960 and Italian Somaliland that became independent from the Italian-administered UN trusteeship on 1 July 1960 to form the Somali Republic.
  53. South Africa.  Independence:  May 31, 1910.
  54. .South Sudan. Independence from Sudan on July 9, 2011. Sudan acquired Independence from Great Britain on January 1, 1956.
  55. Sri Lanka.  Independence:  February 4, 1948.
  56. Sudan.  Independence:  January 1, 1956.
  57. Swaziland.  Independence:  September 6, 1968.
  58. Tonga.  Independence:  June 4, 1970.
  59. Trinidad and Tobago.  Independence:  August 31, 1962.
  60. Tuvalu.  Independence:  October 1, 1978.
  61. Uganda.  Independence:  October 9, 1962.
  62. United Arab Emirates.  Independence:  December 2, 1971.
  63. United Republic of Tanzania. Tanganyika became independent on December 9, 1961 from British Trusteeship; Zanzibar became independent on December 19, 1963; Tanganyika united with Zanzibar on April 26, 1964 to form the United Republic of Tanganyika and Zanzibar; renamed United Republic of Tanzania.
  64. Vanuatu.  Independence from both France and Great Britain on July 30, 1980.
  65. Zambia.  Independence:  October 24, 1964.
  66. Zimbabwe.  Independence:  April 18, 1980.

Germany—1879 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation and Consular Convention

German Treaty

On March 25, 1879, a Treaty was signed between Germany and the Hawaiian Kingdom in Berlin and thereafter ratified by both governments and exchanged. Article II of this treaty provides:

“the subjects and citizens of the two High Contracting Parties may remain and reside in any part of said territories respectively and shall receive and enjoy full and perfect protection for their persons and property.  They shall have free and easy access to the courts of justice, provided by law, in pursuit and defense of their rights, and they shall be at liberty to choose and employ lawyers, advocates or agents to pursue or defend their rights before such courts of justice; and they shall enjoy in this respect all the rights and privileges as native subjects or citizens.”

Neither Germany nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this treaty in accordance with the terms of Article XXVI of the 1879 Treaty.  Therefore, this treaty is still in full force and continues to have legal effect to date.

France—1857 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation

French Treaty

On October 29, 1857, a Treaty was signed between France and the Hawaiian Kingdom in Honolulu and thereafter ratified by both governments. Article IV of this treaty provides:

“their respective subjects shall enjoy, in both States, a constant and complete protection for their persons and properties.  They shall, consequently, have free and easy access to the tribunals of justice, in prosecution and defense of their rights, in every instance, and in all the degrees of jurisdiction established by the laws.”

Neither France nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this treaty in accordance with the terms of Article XXVI of the 1857 Treaty.  Therefore this treaty is still in full force and continues to have legal effect to date. Former French territories, which acquired their independence from France, are successor States to, at the very least, Article IV of the Hawaiian-French Treaty with regard to the citizenry of the successor State that effectively replaced the citizenry of the predecessor State in the treaty. These successor States, which includes mandate territories, are:

  1. Algeria.  Independence:  July 5, 1962.
  2. Benin.  Independence:  August 1, 1960.
  3. Burkina Faso.  Independence:  August 5, 1960.
  4. Central African Republic.  Independence: August 13, 1960.
  5. Chad.  Independence:  August 11, 1960.
  6. Comoros.  Independence:  July 6, 1975.
  7. Congo.  Independence:  August 15, 1960.
  8. Côte D’Ivoire.  Independence:  August 7, 1960.
  9. Djibouti.  Independence:  June 27, 1977.
  10. Gabon.  Independence:  August 17, 1960.
  11. Guinea.  Independence:  October 2, 1958.
  12. Lao People’s Democratic Republic.  Independence:  July 19, 1949.
  13. Lebanon. Independence from French Mandate: November 22, 1943.
  14. Madagascar.  Independence:  June 26, 1960.
  15. Mali.  Independence:  September 22, 1960.
  16. Mauritania.  Independence:  November 28, 1960.
  17. Morocco.  Independence:  March 2, 1956.
  18. Niger.  Independence:  August 3, 1960.
  19. Republic of Cameroon. Independence from French Trusteeship on January 1, 1960.
  20. Senegal.  Independence:  April 4, 1960.
  21. Syria. Independence from French Mandate: April 17, 1946.
  22. Togo. Independence from French Trusteeship on April 27, 1960.
  23. Tunisia.  Independence:  March 20, 1956.
  24. Vanuatu.  Independence from France and Great Britain: July 30, 1980.
  25. Viet Nam.  Independence:  September 2, 1945.

Denmark—1846 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation

Denmark Treaty

On October 19, 1846, a Treaty was signed between Denmark and the Hawaiian Kingdom in Honolulu and thereafter ratified by both governments. Article II of this treaty provides:

“the subjects of His Majesty the King of Denmark, residing within the dominions of the King of the Hawaiian Islands, shall enjoy the same protection in regard to their civil rights as well as to their persons and properties, as native subjects;  and the King of the Hawaiian Islands engages to grant to Danish subjects the same rights and privileges which now are, or may hereafter be, granted to or enjoyed by any other foreigners, subjects of the most favored nation.”

Neither Denmark nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this treaty in accordance with the principles of customary international law.  Therefore, this treaty is still in full force and continues to have legal effect to date. Former Danish territories, which acquired their independence from Denmark, are successor States to, at the very least, Article II of the Hawaiian-Danish Treaty with regard to the citizenry of the successor State that effectively replaced the citizenry of the predecessor State in the treaty. The successor State is:

Iceland.  Independence:  June 7, 1944.

Belgium—1862 Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation

Belgium Treaty

On October 4, 1862, a Treaty was signed between Belgium and the Hawaiian Kingdom in Brussels and thereafter ratified by both governments. Article IV of this treaty provides:

“the respective citizens of the two countries shall enjoy the most constant and complete protection for their persons and property.  Consequently they shall have free and easy access to the court of justice in the pursuit and defense of their rights in every instance and degree of jurisdiction established by the laws.”

Neither Belgium nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this treaty in accordance with the terms of Article XXVII of the 1862 Treaty.  Therefore this treaty is still in full force and continues to have legal effect to date. Former Belgian territories, which acquired their independence from Belgium, are successor States to, at the very least, Article IV of the Hawaiian-Belgian Treaty with regard to the citizenry of the successor State that effectively replaced the citizenry of the predecessor State in the treaty. These successor States are:

  1. Democratic Republic of the Congo.  Independence:  June 30, 1960.
  2. Burundi. Independence from Belgian Trusteeship on July 1, 1962.
  3. Rwanda. Independence from Belgian Trusteeship on July 1, 1962.

Austria/Hungary—1875 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation

Austria-Hungary Treaty

On June 18, 1875, a Treaty was signed between Austria-Hungary and the Hawaiian Kingdom in London and thereafter ratified by both governments. Article IV of this treaty provides:

“the Citizens of each high contracting Parties when resident in the territory of the other shall enjoy the most constant and complete protection for their persons and property, and for this purpose they shall have free and easy access to the Courts of Justice, provided by law, in pursuit and defense of their rights.  They shall be at liberty to employ lawyers, advocates or Agents to prosecute or defend their rights before such Courts of Justice.  In fact they shall enjoy in this respect all the rights and privileges which are granted to natives, and shall be subject to the same conditions.”

Following the dismemberment of Austria-Hungary into two separate States of Austria and Hungary following the first Word War, Hungary also became a State party with Austria to the 1875 Treaty with the Hawaiian Kingdom.

Neither Austria nor Hungary nor the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice to the other of its intention to terminate this treaty in accordance with the terms of Article XIX of the 1875 Treaty.  Therefore this treaty is still in full force, continues to have legal effect to date. Former Austro-Hungarian territories, which acquired their independence from Austria-Hungary, are successor States to, at the very least, Article IV of the Hawaiian-Austro/Hungarian Treaty. These successor States are:

  1. Czech Republic. Independence: October 28, 1918.
  2. Poland. Independence: November 11, 1918.
  3. Slovakia. Independence: Independence: October 28, 1918.

Hawaiian Kingdom Treaties and International Law

The Hawaiian Kingdom is a member State of the Universal Postal Union since January 1, 1882, has forty-six (46) State treaty partners, and, to a limited degree, one hundred twenty-seven (127) successor State quasi-treaty partners. In the Hawaiian Kingdom’s Protest and Demand filed with the President of the United Nations General Assembly on August 10, 2012, the Hawaiian Kingdom’s identification of successor States collectively included former colonial, mandate and trust territories. This identification was made without any prejudice to the particular rights of each successor States in relation to the mode of exercising self-determination when they achieved their independence.

According to Professor Oppenheim, “there is room for the view that in case of separation resulting in the emergence of a new State the latter is bound by—or at least entitled to accede to—general treaties of a ‘law-making’ nature, especially those of a humanitarian character.”Beato explains, “contrary to conventional law’s clean slate doctrine, relatively few newly independent states renounce all of their predecessor state’s treaties. Instead, new states tend to adopt a pragmatic approach which balances issues of self-determination and sovereignty in foreign affairs against the need to foster stability in international relations.” Professor Hershey states that it “is generally agreed that the purely local or personal rights and obligations of the [predecessor State]…remain with the [successor State].” Treaty obligations to private individuals survive the succession and bind the successor State.

Provisions of these treaties not only protect the private rights and obligations of the citizenry of the predecessor States and their successor States while within the territory of the Hawaiian Kingdom, but also protect the private rights and obligations of the citizenry of the Hawaiian Kingdom while within the territories of the predecessor States and their successor States. This rule stems from the principle of international law that change in sovereignty does not affect the private rights of individuals.

An example of successorship is Australia. Under the Hawaiian-British Treaty of 1851, British territory included Australia, which at the time was a Crown colony. On January 1, 1901, Australia was granted independence by Great Britain and was no longer a part of British territory. Australia became a successor State of Great Britain, who is now the predecessor State to Australia. The private rights which British subjects held under the 1851 Hawaiian-British Treaty while within Hawaiian territory would now apply to Australian citizens, and the private rights of Hawaiian subjects held under the Hawaiian-British Treaty would apply when Hawaiian subjects are in Australian territory.

Hawaiian Territory and the Law of Occupation

Territorial sovereignty is the independent right of a State to carry out its activities over a territory that has been internationally recognized as belonging to a State. Since the occupation of the Hawaiian Islands by the United States on August 12, 1898, the laws of occupation apply to Hawaiian territory and where the Hawaiian Kingdom exercised its right of territorial sovereignty, the United States would temporarily exercise the Hawaiian right within the limitations imposed by the 1893 Lili`uokalani assignment and the Restoration Agreement, being international compacts, the 1907 Hague Convention, IV, and the 1949 Geneva Convention, IV, and U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10. §6 of the Hawaiian Civil Code states:

“The laws are obligatory upon all persons, whether subjects of this kingdom, or citizens or subjects of any foreign State, while within the limits of this kingdom, except so far as exception is made by the laws of nations in respect to Ambassadors or others.  The property of all such persons, while such property is within the territorial jurisdiction of this kingdom, is also subject to the laws.”

The Islands constituting the defined territory of the Hawaiian Kingdom that was internationally recognized in 1893, together with its territorial seas whereby the channels between adjacent Islands are contiguous, its exclusive economic zone of two hundred miles, and its air space, include:

Island:                   Location:                               Square Miles/Acreage:

Hawai‘i                 19º 30′ N 155º 30′ W             4,028.2 / 2,578,048
Maui                      20º 45′ N 156º 20′ W             727.3 / 465,472
O‘ahu                    21º 30′ N 158º 00′ W             597.1 / 382,144
Kaua‘i                   22º 03′ N 159º 30′ W             552.3 / 353,472
Molokai                 21º 08′ N 157º 00′ W             260.0 / 166,400
Lana‘i                    20º 50′ N 156º 55′ W             140.6 / 89,984
Ni‘ihau                  21º 55′ N 160º 10′ W             69.5 / 44,480
Kaho‘olawe           20º 33′ N 156º 35′ W             44.6 / 28,544
Nihoa                    23º 06′ N 161º 58′ W             0.3 / 192
Molokini               20º 38′ N 156º 30′ W             0.04 / 25.6
Lehua                    22º 01′ N 160º 06′ W             0.4 / 256
Ka‘ula                   21º 40′ N 160º 32′ W             0.2 / 128
Laysan                   25º 50′ N 171º 50′ W             1.6 / 1,024
Lisiansky               26º 02′ N 174º 00′ W             0.6 / 384
Palmyra                 05º 52′ N 162º 05′ W             4.6 / 2,944
Ocean                    28º 25′ N 178º 25′ W             0.4 / 256

TOTAL:                   6,427.74 (square miles) / 4,113,753.6 (acres)

Hawaiian Nationality and the Law of Occupation

The Hawaiian nationality is termed Hawaiian subject and not Hawaiian citizen. The distinction between subject and citizen is that the former is the political status of an individual in a monarchical form of government, whether absolute or constitutional, and the latter is the political status of an individual in a republic or non-monarchical government.

Under Hawaiian law, nationality can be acquired four ways:

  1. Born within Hawaiian territory—jus soli, also called native-born or natural-born;
  2. Born outside of Hawaiian territory from parents with Hawaiian nationality—jus sanguinis;
  3. Naturalize. The Minister of the Interior, with the approval of the Monarch, shall have the power in person upon the application of any alien foreigner who shall have resided within the Kingdom five years or more, stating his intention to become a permanent resident of the Kingdom, to administer the oath of allegiance to such foreigner, if satisfied that it will be for the good of the Kingdom. (§429, Article VIII, Hawaiian Civil Code);
  4. Denizen. The Monarch can confer upon any alien resident abroad, or temporarily resident in this Kingdom, letters patent of denization, conferring upon such alien, without abjuration of allegiance, all the rights, privileges and immunities of a native. The letters patent shall render the denizen in all respects accountable to the laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom, and impose upon him the like fealty to the King, as if he had been naturalized. (§433, Article VIII, Hawaiian Civil Code).

Once a State is occupied, international law preserves the status quo of the occupied State as it was before the occupation began. To preserve the nationality of the occupied State from being manipulated by the occupying State to its advantage, international law only allows individuals born within the territory of the occupied State to acquire the nationality of their parents. To preserve the status quo, Article 49 of the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention mandates that the “Occupying Power shall not…transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” To do so is a war crime.

For individuals, who were born within Hawaiian territory, to be a Hawaiian subjects they must be a direct descendant of an individual who was a Hawaiian subject prior to the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom government on January 17, 1893. All other individuals born this date to the present are aliens who can only acquire the nationality of their parents.

According to the 1890 government census, Hawaiian subjects numbered 48,107, with the aboriginal Hawaiians, both pure and part, numbering 40,622, being 84% of the national population, and the non-aboriginal Hawaiians numbering 7,485, being 16%. Despite the massive migrations of foreigners to the Hawaiian Islands since 1898, which, according to the State of Hawai‘i Office of Hawaiian Affairs, numbers 1,302,939 in 2009, with the aboriginal Hawaiian population at 322,812 (25.3%), the status quo of the national population of the Hawaiian Kingdom is maintained.

In other words, with the increase in numbers of Hawaiian subjects, both aboriginal and non-aboriginal, since 1893, the status quo of the Hawaiian national population has been maintained to date. Therefore, under the international laws of occupation, the aboriginal Hawaiian population of 322,812 in 2009 would continue to be 84% of the Hawaiian national population, and the non-aboriginal Hawaiian population of 61,488 would continue to be 16%. The balance of the population in 2009, being 918,639, are aliens.

Viewers of the Hawaiian Kingdom Weblog from 45 Countries and Territories

Screen Shot 2013-01-31 at 11.33.05 AM

As of today, viewers of the Hawaiian Kingdom Weblog are from the following countries. The listing of countries is by priority of number of views and not by alphabetical order.

United States, Australia, Canada, Japan, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Italy, Philippines, Germany, India, France, Austria, Switzerland, Turkey, Netherlands, Iceland, Norway, Spain, Denmark, Côte d’Ivoire, Qatar, Iceland, Timor-Leste, Sweden, Puerto Rico, Singapore, United States Minor Outlying Islands, Nigeria, Belgium, French Polynesia, Uganda, Luxembourg, Indonesia, Kuwait, Czech Republic, Chile, Saint Lucia, Portugal, Fiji, Russian Federation, Mexico, Brunei Darussalam, Pakistan, Virgin Islands, and Hong Kong.

Swiss General Secretariat Receives the Hawaiian Kingdom’s Accession to the Fourth Geneva Convention

Ambassador BattigOn January 14, 2013, Ambassador Benno Bättig, General Secretariat of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA), received at his office in Berne, Switzerland, the Hawaiian Kingdom’s Instrument of Accession to the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention for the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Along with the Instrument of Accession, Ambassador Bättig also received a copy of the Hawaiian Protest and Demand deposited with the President of the United Nations General Assembly, August 10, 2012; and a DVD package of the Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom arbitration case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration, The Hague, Netherlands, 2001.

Swiss_Receipt_GCIV

The FDFA is responsible for maintaining the foreign relations of Switzerland and serves as the Swiss Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The department is headed by Federal Councillor Didier Burkhalter. The FDFA is composed of a General Secretariat and the State Secretariat, to which the department’s directorates and agencies are subordinate. Ambassador Bättig was appointed General Secretariat January 11, 2012.

CLARIFICATION: Article 156  of the Fourth Geneva Convention provides that accessions shall be notified in writing to the Swiss Federal Council and the Swiss Federal Council shall communicate the accessions to all the Powers in whose name the Convention has been signed, or whose accession has been notified. The Swiss Federal Council receives accessions through the FDFA. And according to Article 159, the Swiss Federal Council also informs the Secretary-General of the United Nations of all ratifications, accessions and denunciations received by them.