On August 29, 2018, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia Rhonda L. Campbell sent a communication to Dr. David Keanu Sai, Chairman of the Council of Regency and Petitioner for an extension to respond to the Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
“Sir: I will be requesting a 30-day extension of time, to and through, October 10, 2018, to Answer or otherwise respond to your complaint. Please inform me of your position. Thank you.”
Dr. Sai responded later that day:
“Ma’am: Notwithstanding the emergency nature of the petition for writ of mandamus, I am agreeable to your request.”
This is going to be very interesting!!! Can’t Wait!!!
When is it going to be over when will Hawaiian Kingdom blog back their Sovereign Nation because there are among a lot of mothers out there kidnapping children from the mainland to go to Hawaii and Liv and get exempt because of our laws stating that they did not leave the country our constitution says our borders are within the four corners and extends outside to the people of our territories not the land which people misunderstand mothers get exempt where fathers do not if they take their children to another state because I use misleading of words in a contract that is military admiralty maritime law
They went OMG! To WTF!!
Yes it is!
Has the US ever responded to any of Dr. Sai’s court submissions where their reps are named / 3rd parties since his first fed mandamus in (i believe) 1997? A request for an extension, or a response period, is intriguing.. Stay tuned…
This is quite interesting, as a response of this magnitude is unheard of, in this 2K century so far by the U.S. The fact that Dr. Keanu has named other countries in this Writ of Mandamus communique who are also high-acting nations in the International Family Alliance, bound by treaties to uphold our independence as a member nation puts the onus of responsibility on them for mutual respect vis a vis our Hawaiian Kingdom. This is a monumental response by the Assistant U.S. Attorney Rhonda L. Campbell. I can only imagine the scenario of round tables that will extenuate from Dr. Keanu’s Writ of Mandamus to the United States, especially on the international Alliance of Treaty member nations.
What’s ‘International Family Alliance’ and ‘International Alliance of Treaty’ member nations? I was curious and did some research but found nothing. This stressed me out a bit I can’t lie. I think you meant International Law?
E kala mai i au e Kaulana. The frame of reference I used was per the kahaa.org’s website under their Faq, Timeline, Ku’oko’a-Independence: 11/28/1843 Hawaiian Kingdom becomes first non-European member of the Family of Nations. I perceived this as an international Understanding of the Law, as did the alliance of 20 or so signatory member nations at that time, which included the U.S. They are still valid treaties, that have never been revoked.
We honestly may hope that Assistant U.S. Attorney Rhonda L. Campbell won’t be removed from her post by the White House before the extended deadline, however in these turbulent political times everything is possible.
TODAY, is Queen Liliu`okalani’s birthday, 180 years old, September 2nd, 1838. “HAU`OLI LA HANAU”. It’s GOOD NEWS. We, humbly say “mahalo nui” to Assistant U.S. Attorney Rhonda L. Campbell for responding to Keanu’s court submission. Aloha, Aunty Ceci and Uncle Francis—Pukuilua, Hana.
Time to step it up into a higher realm.
What does that mean?
Aloha. This appears to be good news. What happens if the Writ of Mandamus isn’t answered.
Aloha, that is a good question. I can’t see how they could possibly answer it in a meaningful way because that would implicate themselves in a fraudulent annexation and occupation. If they try to fudge an explanation to justify their violations it would be a flawed argument like that of DOJ attorney John Woo that the international community will reject and use against them. The best option for them would probably be to refuse to answer it just like the first Writ of Mandamus. For these same reasons Corporation Counsel won’t provide an answer to Ms. Ruggles request for a legal opinion. I suspect either way it goes it’s evidence that they were made aware of the facts of the occupation that will be part of the official record. They are buying time and will drag it on as long as possible. What other options do they have? They are not in a hurry to just give up. I just hope they don’t do what they normally do when in such a predicament. Attack the accuser with a campaign to discredit him/her and shift the narrative away from the real issue. MHO
Aloha,
It is the obligation of the court to uphold the U.S. constitution.
A case to look at: Marbury v. Madison (1803), concerning how writ of mandamus are used and its effective consistency with the U.S. constitution. That case is responsible for what is known as Judicial Review.
We have been enlightened that the congress of the United States of America is without extraterritorial authority beyond its borders. (Hawaii, off limit)
With respect to the Hawaiian Kingdom, did the congress of the United States or even the U.S. President have the authority to unilateral annex a co-equal sovereign state consistent to the United States constitution? (No)
It’s hard to get around that bad boy huh? Mind blowing!
The complexity of this question was so overwhelming it crippled the U.S. Department of Justice in 1988, and brought them to a screeching halt! (Sarcasm) ?
See point 120 of the writ of mandamus. Even the U.S. DOJ opined, it is “unclear which constitutional power Congress excercised when it aquired Hawaii by joint resolution.” Whaaaaaaat kind of review is that? 30 years later it needs another 30 days? Okay hana hou, I guess it’s safe to say nothing changed in the last 30 years so another 30 days might produce a different result, but if it doesn’t we already know it’s leading to insanity!
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, pulled out of the UN Human Rights Council on June 19, 2018, around six days before the Writ of Mandamus was filed blasting the council as a “protector of human rights abusers and cesspool of political bias” and accused the body of “politicizing and scapegoating countries with positive human rights records.”
I can only speculate that she was tipped off when the case number for the writ was issued for filing.
I believe she shouldn’t have pulled out because the biggest human rights abuser will be taking center stage.
It being she has access to first hand knowledge of political bias she could explain how a country can be in a state of war for over 100 years and not receive any assistance from any other country. Hmmm, protector of human rights abusers. I wonder who that could be? Hm
Too many eyes on this globally for the DOJ to screw up!
Then again, Jeff Sessions is on deck, auwe! ?
Unfortunately that’s the only option available and that is to screw up! If not they’ll end up doing the right thing! ?
We see, October 10, 2018!
Hirono released Kavanaugh remarks regarding Hawaiian Trusts, today. Got me to thinking that those private trusts, set up by Alii, which have been pillaged, are being referenced by a candidate for the SCOTUS. That seems like International law directly intersecting w/ US law.
As soon as we intervene into this case we will be objecting to an extension, we have waited 125 years, remember “prolonged” if these criminals want more time to genocide us $1000 a minute (Tresevant v. The city of Tampa) scotus holding, not. We are not consenting to a continuing crime of aggression and genocide, these types of international crimes require immediate relief, redress and remedies, regent Dr. Sai does not speak for me.
Are you pro se or have an attorney?
You said “we”, are you or “we” doing a class action?
James C. Trezevant sued CITY OF TAMPA and was awarded $25,000.00. I don’t see how you are citing that case in an attempt to intervene to be awarded damages when the Writ of Mandamus is being used for an Administrative remedy. What you call intervening is actually called interloping. Instead of being an interloper on someone else’s case just do your own case. Good luck with that.
Mr. kekoa, I think you are missing the point…
“we will be objecting to an extension, we have waited 125 years, remember “prolonged” if these criminals want more time to genocide us $1000 a minute (Tresevant v. The city of Tampa) scotus holding, not” (and we will)
Tresevant v. The city of Tampa is a holding on unlawful detention (like the U.S. v. Schooner Amistad) and the unlawful taking of jurisdiction over the persons, besides slavery and immediate release as the remedy… (we are not there for the dala)
“We are not consenting to a continuing (not for another second for US & SOH criminals to do the very thing that oppress our people) crime of aggression and genocide, these types of international (serious) crimes require immediate (not in 30 days) relief, redress and remedies, regent Dr. Sai does not speak for me”
This case involves and talks about the me’s and the I’s and the you’s and the we’s who domicile, live, operate and conduct wholly within the physical geographical and jurisdictional territorial boundaries of the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands… (the outcome of this case will affect my rights directly)
I’ve said this a few times;
I don’t see an occupation! instead, I see a criminal (USA & SOH) enterprise and all of its cohorts aiding and abetting the continuing crimes of high treason running around in my Christian Kingdom breaking the laws (crime of aggression & genocide) of the world… we have not agreed to let these criminals operate our laws in our country, that belongs to the people & chiefs of the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. This is why regent Dr. Sai does not speak for me…
I am an Hawaiian Subject not an interloper, I don’t have a degree, I have the scars of oppression and this is MY County!
Thank you very much
Keliihuluhulu
Royal Patent 990 to Kapaiki
Kalaoa IV, Kona Akau Hawaii Island
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
I think you are missing the point in Trezevant vs. CITY OF TAMPA, Mr. Trezevant initiated his case in a lower court and was awarded $25K for damages and attorney’s fees for twenty three minutes of unlawful detention. It was Appealed to a Federal Court and he won the Appeal. You have no case initiated in a lower court in order take it up to the Supreme Court to seek damages. A Writ of mandamus is different in that it originates at the Supreme Court. I guess you can’t see the bigger picture that benefits everyone and not just yourself. Are you so arrogant and selfish to put yourself or your ego ahead of our country and it’s subjects???? I guess I have to draw the bigger picture for you. The Petition mentions Iraq’s violation of international humanitarian law when it invaded Kuwait on 2 August 1990, and, like the United States, did not administer Kuwaiti law as mandated by the Hague and Geneva Conventions. This led to the formation of the United Nations Compensation Commission (UNCC) by the United Nations Security Council under resolution 687 (1991). The mandate of the UNCC was to process claims and pay compensation for losses or damages incurred as a direct result of Iraq’s unlawful invasion and occupation of Kuwait. In total, the UNCC awarded $52.4 billion dollars for an unlawful occupation that lasted seven months. If this formula is applied to the unlawful invasion and occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom since 16 January 1893 that compensation amount would be staggering. I guess you can’t wait thirty days so everyone benefits. Either you are to ignorant to understand what is about to take place or you understand very well and are intentionally doing this to sabotage the process. Let everyone judge for themselves.
thank you very much
Your welcome.
Hope Keanu appeals the dismissal of his writ!
Specifically the courts conclusion and I quote;
“Sai’s argument fails to acknowledge the realities of U.S. history. After President Cleveland’s denouncement, U.S. officials later condoned the actions of the U.S. forces in the islands, (crime of aggression) the Hawaiian monarchy was dethroned, (not its identity as a sovereign Christian Hawaiian Kingdom) and President McKinley signed a Joint Resolution to annex the Hawaiian Islands as a territory of the United States in 1898. (Unconstitutional, unconsented, uncompensated taking of the use of our lands both national and private) Sai I, 778 F. Supp. 2d at 4. Hawaii became a state in 1959 and remains so today” (evidence of the crime and extermination of our national group)
What an opportunity and open door.
We may intervene just for that reason, because the judge put their foot in their mouth.
I mean they can play with the political question doctrine (that was a given) to dodge and get around the crime happening here in our Kingdom (GENOCIDE) but that will never make their act lawful, these criminals are simply running around in our kingdom breaking the law of our land and that of the world and I am excited about what they just said in their memorandum…
share
Keliihuluhulu
Why are you so excited? It was expected. They are never gonna change so knock yourself out. Intervene then appeal and then what? You think you are going to bring it up before the full SCOTUS? They pick and choose what cases they want to hear and I guarantee they will never hear this one. They got you chasing your tail and you don’t even know it. Like I said in the last post you are missing the bigger picture but that’s ok. I guess chasing your tail is normal.
Once again, THANK you very much!
Does anybody have the Hawaiian Kingdom Constitution if so can you send it to me
And white people must understand that the United States Will Never Surrender the land back to Hawaii Kingdom because they make money off of you people if you look under the creation of the birth certificate that is the reason why you are taken the country has been broke ever since the 17 hundreds when we were fighting the British income tax is illegal it is only there for the purpose of paying the debt back to the British government all lawyers and judges are foreign agents to the British government they can be sued in their person but never put a judge and attorney a prosecutor a police officer as their title in a lawsuit
Aloha
If you domicile, live , operate and conduct wholly within the physical geographical and jurisdictional territorial boundaries of the Kingdom of the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands and suffer an injury by USA or SOH while in your own country (including a parking ticket) lets enter (INTERVENE) your injuries in the case below. This is only a draft and some names that will be filed in this case. Many are in this case and many more are entering.
Make a list of persons or individuals that is the proximate cause of your injuries or the injuries against your kupuna and ohana. lets flood the scotus (Supreme Court) with all of our real and continuing injuries, lets go chase our tails in their court to exhaust our remedies before entering the international arena. USA and SOH are not above the laws of this world we are not going away!
This action under rule 17 will be filed, no we don’t have an attorney (yet) remember, our injuries are real and continuing, these criminals are not running our government they are just running around in our country breaking the laws!
We (people & chiefs of the Hawaiian Kingdom) own the right to operate our own government, We turn the keys to operate our own machinery and no one is saying we can’t! “Holomua”
We are not looking for our Kingdom like some have and are suggesting, we are living in our Kingdom under the crime of genocide by USA & SOH.
Genocidaire, Aiders and abettors and complicit need not apply or comment, you can do that in the courts.
This task is a big undertaking, because it includes you the Hawaiian Subjects. all of our people & chiefs from all of our islands. “Lokahi”
Send your contact information to ekalesia@outlook.com
Mahalo
Imua ke Akua
I remain your humble servant
DRAFT
Government of the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands, Ex Rel
Keliihuluhulu, Kuhina Nui
Ka Ekalesia Hoole Pope o Kekaha; Royal Patent Grant 990 to Kapaiki
Kalaoa 4, Kona Akau, Hawaii Island Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Kanaka Relator
v.
Tupou VI, King of Tonga, Successor and Heir to the Founder of Free Church of Tonga; 1st Floor, O.G. Sanft & Sons Building, Western Corner of Taufa’ahau Road and Wellington Road, Nuku’alofa. P.O. Box 1380, Nuku’alofa,
KINGDOM OF TONGA
Semisi Fonua, President of Free Church of Tonga; Tasanoc P.O.Box 84 Nuku’alofa KINGDOM OF TONGA
KOSRAE CHURCH ET AL
Benny & Austin
Deanna Sako, Director County of Hawaii; Department of Finance Attn. Administrator; 25 Aupuni Street Suite 2103 Hilo HI 96720
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Harry Kim, Mayor County of Hawaii
25 Aupuni Street Hilo HI 96720
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Joseph K. Kamelamela, County of Hawaii
Hawaii State Bar Association Member
101 Aupuni Street Unit 325 Hilo, HI 96720
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Mitch Roth, County of Hawaii
Hawaii State Bar Association Member
655 Kilauea Ave Hilo HI 96720
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Paul K. Ferreira, Police Chief, County of Hawaii 349 Kapiolani Street Hilo HI 96720 Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Kenneth Bugado Jr. County of Hawaii
349 Kapiolani Street Hilo HI 96720
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Jessie A. Jumalon, Secretary to Assistant Chief James B. O’Connor and Major Robert Wagner Hawaii Police Department 74-611 Hale Maka’i Place Kailua-Kona, HI 96740
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
James B. O’Connor Asst. Chief County of Hawaii Hawaii Police Department 74-611 Hale Maka’i Place Kailua-Kona, HI 96740
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Robert Wagner, Major County of Hawaii Hawaii Police Department 74-611 Hale Maka’i Place Kailua-Kona, HI 96740
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Lt. Shopay, County of Hawaii
Hawaii Police Department 74-611 Hale Maka’i Place Kailua-Kona, HI 96740
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Ryan Caday, County of Hawaii
Hawaii State Bar Association Member
655 Kilauea Ave Hilo HI 96720
Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands. H. I.
Shannon Kagawa,
Christopher Schlueter,
Anmar Alnagem,
Kori Weinberger,
Timothy J. Rodes,
Jeffrey Burlson,
Michael Schlueter,
Mark Disher,
Leslie Kawamoto,
E. Brit Bailey,
William T. Reece,
Ivan Van Leer,
Noland P. Espinda,
Shelly Nobriga,
Kelcie Makaiki,
Jill M. Akuna,
Fa Y. Hoota,
Stephen Powell,
Joey Guzman,
Ben Heloca,
Lisa Ciriako,
Barbara Lee,
Robert A. Estacion,
Richard Rameriz,
Elizabeth A. Strance,
Ronald Ibarra,
Joseph P. Florendo Jr.,
Jay Kimura,
Melvin Fujina,
Margaret Masunaga,
Peter Bresciani,
Greg Nakamura,
Harry Freitas,
Bruce A. Larson,
Mark Bennett,
Defendants,
Just as I suspected, another Troll. Anyone thinking of doing what this troll is suggesting will not only screw things up but you will be opening yourselves up for civil and criminal liability. How better to document your state of mind by intentionally and knowingly submitting your names to a court document that can be used as evidence against you. Not to smart guys.
What Writ are you referring to, having been denied? Feels like you are confusing the topic.
Aloha Noelani, if you are talking to me, I was talking about the u.s. district courts sua sponte dismissal of Regent Keanu Sai’s Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Sorry for any confusion…
Anyone know when the update for this may be shared? Waiting with great interest to read the response.
So the writ of Mandamus has been dismissed?? I thought that wasn’t possible for that kind of procedure? I guess no update coz Dr.Sai is preparing to appeal?
Mahalo