Hawai‘i: A Humanitarian Crisis of Unimaginable Proportions

UN_Human_Rights_Council_LogoIn a move to bring international attention to the humanitarian crisis in the Hawaiian Islands as a result of the United States prolonged and illegal occupation since the Spanish-American War, a Complaint was submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Council (Council) on May 23, 2016. Dr. Keanu Sai represents the complainant, Kale Kepekaio Gumapac, as his attorney-in-fact. Dr. Sai also represents Gumapac before Swiss authorities regarding war crimes. Additional documents that accompanied the Complaint, included: War Crimes Report: Humanitarian Crisis in the Hawaiian Islands by Dr. Sai, his Declaration and Curriculum Vitae.

Dr. Keanu Sai“The lodging of the complaint was two-fold,” explains Dr. Sai. “First, the complaint will draw attention to the prolonged occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom, which has created a humanitarian crisis of unimaginable proportions never before seen. Second, the purpose of the complaint is to report the war crimes committed against Kale Gumpac by Deutsche Bank, officials of the State of Hawai‘i, and others, which is now before the Swiss Federal Criminal Court. As a victim of war crimes, Mr. Gumapac is one of thousands, if not millions of victims who reside in Hawai‘i under an illegal foreign occupation.”

The Council was established in 2006 by the United Nations General Assembly and was formerly known as the United Nations Commission on Human Rights. The General Assembly gave the Council two main responsibilities: (a) promote universal respect for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction of any kind and in a fair and equal manner; and (b) address situations of violations of human rights, including gross and systematic violations, and make recommendations to resolve them. The Council is comprised of 47 member States of the United Nations who are elected by the United Nations General Assembly for a term of three years.

The Council has a human rights mandate, but has also included as part of its mandate international humanitarian law. International human rights law are rights inherent in all human beings, whatever their nationality, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, color, religion, language, or any other status. These rights are expressed in treaties such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. International humanitarian law is a set of rules to protect civilians and non-combatants during an armed conflict, which includes military occupation. Humanitarian law is expressed in treaties such as the 1907 Hague Convention, IV, and the 1949 Geneva Convention, IV.

In the past, it was thought that human rights law applied only during peace time and humanitarian law applied only during armed conflict, but current international law recognizes that both bodies of law are considered as complementary sources of obligations in situations of armed conflict. In its 2008 Resolution 9/9—Protection of the human rights of civilians in armed conflict, the Council emphasized “that conduct that violates international humanitarian law, including grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, or of the Protocol Additional there of 8 June 1977 relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), may also constitute a gross violation of human rights.”

The Council then reiterated “that effective measures to guarantee and monitor the implementation of human rights should be taken in respect of civilian populations in situations of armed conflict, including people under foreign occupation, and that effective protection against violations of their human rights should be provided, in accordance with international human rights law and applicable international humanitarian law, particularly Geneva Convention IV relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, and other international instruments.”

Accompanying the Complaint is a War Crime Report that provides a comprehensive narrative of Hawai‘i’s legal and political history since the nineteenth century to the present. In the Report, Dr. Sai explains, “The Report will answer, in the affirmative, three fundamental questions that are quintessential to the current situation in the Hawaiian Islands:

  1. Did the Hawaiian Kingdom exist as an independent State and a subject of international law?
  2. Does the Hawaiian Kingdom continue to exist as an independent State and a subject of International Law, despite the illegal overthrow of its government by the United States?
  3. Have war crimes been committed in violation of international humanitarian law?”

After answering these questions in the affirmative, Dr. Sai would then conclude that the UNHRC has the authority to investigate the complaint “under the complaint procedure provided for in paragraph 87 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1.”

Before providing the facts of Gumapac’s case, the Complaint gives a short summary of the Hawaiian Kingdom’s continued existence as a State under international law, and that this status was explicitly recognized by the Secretariat of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in Lance Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom (1999-2001).

In the Complaint, Dr. Sai states, “Since the occupation began, the United States engaged in the criminal conduct of genocide under humanitarian law through denationalization. After local institutions of Hawaiian self-government were destroyed by the United States through its installed insurgency, a United States pattern of administration was imposed in 1900, whereby the former Hawaiian national character was obliterated.”

Dr. Sai went on to provide a pattern of criminal conduct in violation of international humanitarian law: “The United States interfered with the methods of education; compelled education in the English language; banned the use of Hawaiian, being the national language, in the schools; compulsory or automatic granting of United States citizenship upon Hawaiian nationals; imposed conscription of Hawaiian nationals into the armed forces of the United States; imposed the duty of swearing the oath of allegiance; confiscated and destroyed property of Hawaiian nationals for militarization; pillaged the property and estates of Hawaiian nationals; imposed American administrative and judicial systems; imposed American financial and economic administration; colonized Hawaiian territory with nationals of the United States; permeated the economic life through individuals whose nationality and/or allegiance was American; and denied Hawaiian nationals of aboriginal blood their vested right to health care at no charge at Queen’s Hospital, which was established by the Hawaiian government for that purpose.”

The Complaint calls upon the Council to take action without haste and recommends the Council to:

  • Strongly call upon the Government of the United States of America and its armed force, the State of Hawai‘i, to take urgent measures to comply fully with their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and human rights law;
  • Underline that the Government of the United States of America has the primary responsibility to make every effort to strengthen the protection of the civilian population in the Hawaiian Islands and to investigate and bring to justice perpetrators of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law; and
  • Appoint a Special Rapporteur on the humanitarian crisis in the Hawaiian Islands given the gravity and severity of an illegal and prolonged occupation of an independent State that has been allowed to continue unfettered without precedent in the history of international relations.

Additionally, the Council oversees a process called Universal Periodic Review (UPR), which involves a review of the human rights records of all member States of the United Nations, which includes its record of complying with international humanitarian law. In UPRs, the Council decided in its Resolution 5/1 that “given the complementary and mutually interrelated nature of international human rights law and international humanitarian law, the review shall taken into account applicable international humanitarian law.”

In the Complaint, Dr. Sai also draws attention to the UPR done on the United States in 2015. “The February 6, 2015 Report of the United States submitted to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in Conjunction with the Universal Periodic Review deliberately withheld information of the Hawaiian Kingdom despite the United States’ full and complete knowledge of arbitration proceedings held under the auspices of the PCA, and where the Secretariat of the PCA explicitly recognized the continuity of the Hawaiian Kingdom.”

Dr. Sai further states that “the draft report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review of the United States dated May 21, 2015, and the final report of the United Nations Human Rights Council adopted on September 24, 2015, omits any mention of the Hawaiian Kingdom as well.” Instead, the 2015 UPR of the United States treats native Hawaiians as an indigenous people, which, under United Nations instruments, are nations of people that are non-States and reside within the territory of a State, such as Native American tribes. Common words that are associated with indigenous people include terms such as self-determination, colonization, and decolonization.

The 2015 UPR reflects the deception that has been perpetuated by the United States in order to conceal its prolonged occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom that has now lasted for over a century, and the genocide of the Hawaiian citizenry who have been led to believe that aboriginal Hawaiians are an indigenous people that have been colonized by the United States. In the Complaint, Dr. Sai states, “Hawaiian nationals of aboriginal blood are not indigenous people as defined under United Nations instruments, but are defined under Hawaiian Kingdom law as Hawaiian subjects who comprise the majority of the national population.”

The American occupation of Hawai‘i is the longest occupation in the history of international relations, and it will be a shock for the international community to find out that the United States seized an internationally recognized neutral country in order to bolster its military, and carried out a policy of genocide through denationalization in violation of international humanitarian law. This policy that was carried out in 1900 resulted in the obliteration of Hawaiian national consciousness among the citizenry of the Hawaiian Kingdom in less then two generations.

Dr. Lynette Cruz interviews Dr. Sai on the topic of genocide through denationalization on her television show, Issues that Matter. Dr. Sai explains the difference between international humanitarian law and human rights law, and how genocide has and continues to occur through denationalization of Hawaiian subjects.

21 thoughts on “Hawai‘i: A Humanitarian Crisis of Unimaginable Proportions

  1. Mahalo, mahalo and mahalo for this action – I could add my own complaint of genocide and/or forcible eviction by medicine in Hawaii. I hope this has tremendous success. Tourism won’t allow one to see the crisis, but people are dying in Hawaii.

    • And thank you for also including the “Indigenous” and “Native Hawaiian” terms as not pertinent to the national status of the Hawaii Kingdom…so many Native Hawaiian representatives have manipulated that arena to persuade people to take lesser rights than what they are entitled to by law…it is refreshing to see someone with courage pursuing this. Mahalo

  2. People need to go to the Kana’iolowalu site and check to see if your name(s) are there and you have to request to have your name removed. If you were with Kau inoa, Operation ‘Ohana or any other Hawaiian registry all instigated by OHA of which was ratified by “US congress” in 1978, they may claim to represent Hawaiians, that is not the truth, yet they continue to use Hawaiian money from our Hawaiian trust, most Hawaiian barely even see or even hear about.

  3. Mahalo for taking us step by step through the education process before relating this gem! Mahalo nui, for all you do!

    • Mai kai!!! What a shocker to my old puuwai but now I see the malamalama…. Mahalo to all the smart Hawaiians, past, present and forever. EMUA

  4. Mahalo for these important posts to educate and inform the Hawaiian people and the world about what happened and continues to happen to our kingdom and our people. Please continue to monitor and post this crucial news to us. Mahalo for your dedication.
    Aloha, Jody

  5. This blog provides great education about the Hawaiian Kingdom but what I appreciate the most is the practical application of it’s teachings. Interesting to see if this will cause the Swiss Criminal Court to step up their game. A little pressure always makes things interesting. Great job guys, keep up the good work. Mahalo

  6. We, the “native” people of these Islands,acendants of inhabitants prior to Western Invasion, are predominately Polynesian. There well may be Hispanic and Japanese ancestry embedded in our DNA, as well as South American (Marquesan cross-culture), yet we were part of the Pacific Community of Polynesian Societies.
    Our “Kingdom” was organized and “structured”, post-contact, if an effort to achieve and secure recognition from and parity among Nation-States to preserve and perpetuate our ʻOhana. Part of what Westerners fail to grasp is that the ʻAina is part of our ʻOhana. We are subservient to the “Life of the Land”, being “Kamaʻaina”, acculturated to the land itself.
    “Hawaiian”, as well as “Sandwich Islander”, are terms of National identity. In the Hawaiian “Kingdom”, many ethnic groups contributed to the citizenry. During this “expansion”, many Treaties and assurances were sought, and secured among other Nations.
    Those Nations have “turned a blind eye” to the systematic occupation and exploitation of the U.S. of our People, Land and Resources. While many can deny responsibility, none can evade accountability.

  7. ” colonized Hawaiian territory with nationals of the United States; “; I contend that this is worded incorrectly. They didn’t colonize the territory, they forced-assimilated the Americanization within the Hawaiian Kingdom’s territory and allowed U.S. hostile occupiers to flood the territory of the Hawaiian Kingdom and took-over its government and modified it to fit the U.S. government. I always knew I was a Hawaiian Kingdom subject; but the U.S. refused to let me be recognized as such by eliminating my nationality in Hawaii. It made me feel like a stateless person; the U.S. erasing my nationality and I not recognizing the U.S. as my citizenship which is still being forced on me. The U.S. means nothing to me except being another country like Russia, China, Japan, Great Britain, Netherlands, Sweden or Norway, etc.

    I am still a Hawaiian Kingdom subject; but the U.S. won’t allow it and keeps relabeling us to fit its purpose. It needs to deflect its international crimes and have us subject ourselves to it. That’s not going to happen. We are still Hawaiian Kingdom subjects. It is what it is and the U.S. continues to be made up of what it made up.

    • Tane,

      I agree with the incorrect wording. That particular sentence poked out and didn’t sit right with me either. Especially since we need to move away from the “colonization” mythology/terminology, because that is not what happened to Hawaii. It was probably just a less than perfect choice of wording at the time of composing the complaint. A more appropriate wording might have read something like:

      “invasively settled Hawaiian territory with nationals of the United States”

  8. When pertaining to the Hawaiian Kingdom doesn’t the s in State have to be lower case? I remember hearing that on an episode of Kanaka Express. Mahalo.

  9. Is there a way to stay updated on this? Are you sending out email updates? We support and believe in what you are doing. Thank you for standing your ground

  10. True “Independence Day?”
    Blessings over new lyrics to “God Bless America”
    (Any more suggestions?)
    “God Bless Hawai’i Now”
    God Bless Hawai’i Now,
    Island Land that we Love,
    Please release her from your seizure,
    So we can move on with Aloha…Mahalo♡♡
    From the mountains, to the prairies, to the ocean, white with foam.
    God Bless Hawai’i now,
    Our Home Sweet Home;
    God Bless Hawai’i now,
    Our Home Sweet Home…
    Vs.2
    Yes, God Bless Hawai’i Now
    Island Land that we Love,
    Stand beside her and guide her through the night with the light from above.
    From the mountains, to the Prairies, to the ocean white with foam,
    God bless Hawai’i now,
    Our Home Sweet Home.
    God bless Hawai’i now,
    Our Home Sweet Home…

Leave a Reply to Maria Taylor Cancel reply