{"id":875,"date":"2013-09-03T19:36:53","date_gmt":"2013-09-03T19:36:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/?p=875"},"modified":"2017-04-20T17:50:05","modified_gmt":"2017-04-20T17:50:05","slug":"german-federal-prosecutor-receives-war-crime-complaint-from-hawaii-attorney-against-deutsche-bank","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/german-federal-prosecutor-receives-war-crime-complaint-from-hawaii-attorney-against-deutsche-bank\/","title":{"rendered":"German Federal Prosecutor Receives War Crime Complaint From Hawai\u2018i Attorney Against Deutsche Bank"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yesterday, the German Federal Prosecutor received a war crime complaint<\/a> filed by attorney Dexter Kaiama alleging the Management Board of Deutsche Bank, Judge Greg K. Nakamura, and Deutsche Bank attorneys Charles R. Prather, Sofia M. Hirosone, and Michael G.K. Wong committed criminal acts against his clients Mr. Kale Kepekaio Gumapac and Mr. Harris Bright, both being Hawaiian subjects and protected persons under the Fourth Geneva Convention, 1949. The basis of the complaint is Section 6(9) of the German Criminal Code<\/a>, which authorizes the German government to prosecute crimes committed by a German abroad, the German Code of Crimes against International Law<\/a>\u00a0(CCAIL), and the 1879 Hawaiian-German Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation and Consular Convention<\/a>. Deutsche Bank is a German financial institution headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany.<\/p>\n

The complaint alleges that “Deutsche Bank, despite having no valid and legal interest in both of my clients’ property, has deliberately ignored pursuing its proper remedy for financial recovery, and instead, intentionally violated CCAIL (and international law) by initiating a fraudulent and unlawful court process to obtain unlawful orders to evict my clients from their property, thereby committing violations of the CCAIL.” In the complaint, it states that both clients mortgaged their properties that was eventually assigned to Deutsche Bank, but were unaware that their titles to their properties were defective as a direct result of the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian government by the United States in 1893 and the United States subsequent illegal and prolonged occupation.<\/p>\n

Laulima Title Search and Claims, LLC,<\/a> a company owned by Gumapac, was contracted to investigate the title to both properties and determined “This claim involves a defect of title by virtue of an executive agreement entered into between President Grover Cleveland of the United States and Queen Lili\u2018uokalani of the Hawaiian Kingdom, whereby the President and his successors in office were and continue to be bound to faithfully execute Hawaiian Kingdom law by assignment of the Queen under threat of war on January 17th 1893. The notaries public in the Hawaiian Islands and the registrar of the Bureau of Conveyances were not lawful since January 17th 1893, and therefore title to the estate in fee-simple” defective, “because…the deed of conveyance was not lawfully executed in compliance with Hawaiian Kingdom law.”<\/p>\n

Since a mortgage<\/a> is a lien on the title to the property, a defect in title would consequently render the lien invalid, which would also invalidate any foreclosure and ejectment proceedings stemming from the mortgage. In order for lenders to protect themselves from this type of situation, \u00a0they require the borrowers to purchase title insurance<\/a> as a condition of the loan. Both Gumapac and Bright purchased title insurance while they were in escrow that covered the amount of the money each had borrowed. The complaint provides a definition of title insurance from Black’s Law dictionary as a “policy issued by a title company after searching the title, representing the state of that title and insuring the accuracy of its search against claims of title defects.” The complaint further states that title insurance is an “indemnity contract that does not guarantee the state of the title but covers loss incurred from a defect in land titles that would arise from an inaccurate title report.”<\/p>\n

Both Gumapac and Bright each sent a letter with the evidence of the defect in title to Deutsche Bank, and called on “Deutsche Bank to cease the ejectment proceedings and to file an insurance claim under the lender’s title insurance policy.” Deutsche Bank refused to file the insurance claim and maintained the proceedings to evict Gumapac and Bright in the Third Circuit Court in Hilo.<\/p>\n

Because Deutsche Bank refused to file the insurance claim, motions to dismiss with evidence were filed with the Third Circuit Court. The basis for the dismissals were that since Hawai\u2018i is under a prolonged and illegal occupation, the court, which is an American court, cannot claim to have authority in the Hawaiian Islands if Hawai\u2018i is not part of the United States. Despite having Judge Nakamura take judicial notice<\/a> of the evidence and the attorneys for Deutsche Bank providing no counter evidence, Judge Nakamura denied the motion and eventually issued the orders for eviction.\u00a0According to Kaiama, this is evidence of an unfair trial and pillaging because Deutsche Bank is attempting to seize property that they have no legal interest through a court that is illegal. Both unfair trial and pillaging are war crimes under Sections 8 and 9 of the German Code of Crimes against International Law.<\/p>\n

On November 14, 2006, the Center for Constitutional Rights<\/a> filed a war crime complaint with the German Federal Prosecutor against:<\/p>\n