{"id":6664,"date":"2023-09-14T10:18:27","date_gmt":"2023-09-14T20:18:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/?p=6664"},"modified":"2023-09-14T10:23:29","modified_gmt":"2023-09-14T20:23:29","slug":"the-significance-and-the-importance-of-the-two-operational-plans-of-the-council-of-regency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/the-significance-and-the-importance-of-the-two-operational-plans-of-the-council-of-regency\/","title":{"rendered":"The Significance and the Importance of the Two Operational Plans of the Council of Regency"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

When dealing with a 130-year crisis of a prolonged and illegal American occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom, planning is a crucial component that informs where we are today and where we want to be tomorrow. An operational plan is informed by due diligence of the situation, which is a gathering of information relevant to the situation at hand and how it got to the current situation. In the military, this is colloquially known as gathering intel<\/em> before you come up with a battle plan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Due diligence is \u201cdepending on the relative facts of the special case.\u201d It is the assessment of a situation before a decision should be made. When due diligence is done, the person doing it must be mindful of their own biases and assumptions. To gather information through one\u2019s own bias is what is called \u201cconfirmation bias\u201d where the gatherer of information only selects information that would confirm his\/her own biases. This is also called cherry picking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the Hawaiian situation, there is an abundance of assumptions that are false such as the Hawaiian Islands were colonized by the United States in the nineteenth century, and, as a colonized people, Native Hawaiians are an Indigenous People by definition of the United Nations. United Nations defines Indigenous Peoples as tribal nations that exist with an independent State not of their own making. Arriving at this conclusion was done through confirmation bias.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Council of Regency sought to gather information through the lens of both the laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom and international law that includes international humanitarian law and the law of occupation. It was through this process that revealed that the Hawaiian Kingdom, which existed as an internationally recognized sovereign and independent State continued to exist since November 28, 1843, despite the illegal overthrow of its government by the United States on January 17, 1893. This continued existence stemmed from the international principle of inalienability of sovereignty of a State, and the only way a State can alienate its sovereignty is by its consent through a treaty of cession with the acquiring State. There exists no such treaty, therefore, the Hawaiian State continues to exist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was based on this premise that the government was restored as a Council of Regency in 1997 to provisionally represent the Hawaiian State both domestically and abroad. The actions to be taken by the Council of Regency would be in line with its strategic plan<\/a><\/strong> that entailed three phases. Phase I\u2014verification of the Hawaiian Kingdom as an independent State and a subject of international law. Phase II\u2014exposure of Hawaiian Statehood within the framework of international law and the laws of occupation as it affects the realm of politics and economics at both the international and domestic levels. Phase III\u2014restoration of the Hawaiian Kingdom as an independent State and a subject of international law. Phase III is when the American occupation comes to an end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Phase I was achieved when the Permanent Court of Arbitration<\/a><\/strong> (PCA), before establishing the arbitration tribunal in Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom<\/em> <\/a><\/strong>on June 9, 2000, acknowledged the continued existence of the Hawaiian State, and the Council of Regency as its government. Phase II, exposure of the Hawaiian State, was initiated during oral hearings<\/a><\/strong> on December 7, 8 and 11, 2000, at the PCA in The Hague. Phase II continued at the University of Hawai\u2018i at M\u0101noa when the Chairman of the Council of Regency, David Keanu Sai, entered the political science graduate program, where he received a master\u2019s degree specializing in international relations and public law in 2004 and a Ph.D. degree in 2008 on the subject of the continuity of Hawaiian Statehood while under an American prolonged belligerent occupation since 1893.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The exposure through academic research also motivated historian Tom Coffman to change the title of his 1998 book from Nation Within: The Story of America\u2019s Annexation of the Nation of Hawai\u2018i<\/a><\/strong>, to Nation Within\u2014The History of the American Occupation of Hawai\u2018i<\/a><\/strong>. Coffman explained the change in his note on the second edition and took a quote from Dr. Sai’s law article A Slippery Path Towards Hawaiian Indigeneity<\/a><\/strong>. Coffman wrote:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

I am compelled to add that the continued relevance of this book reflects a far-reaching political, moral and intellectual failure of the United States to recognize and deal with the takeover of Hawai\u2018i. In the book\u2019s subtitle, the word Annexation has been replaced by the word Occupation, referring to America\u2019s occupation of Hawai\u2018i. Where annexation connotes legality by mutual agreement, the act was not mutual and therefore not legal. Since by definition of international law there was no annexation, we are left then with the word occupation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In making this change, I have embraced the logical conclusion of my research into the events of 1893 to 1898 in Honolulu and Washington, D.C. I am prompted to take this step by a growing body of historical work by a new generation of Native Hawaiian scholars. Dr. Keanu Sai writes, \u201cThe challenge for \u2026 the fields of political science, history, and law is to distinguish between the rule of law and the politics of power.\u201d In the history of the Hawai\u2018i, the might of the United States does not make it right.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

It took the Council of Regency just over 20 years to change the conversation from colonization and indigenous peoples rights to military occupation and the rights of Hawaiian subjects under the law of occupation. With the shifting of the historical lens, legal consequences began to emerge especially with the involvement of Professor Matthew Craven from the University of London, SOAS, School of Law, who authored a legal opinion on the Continuity of the Hawaiian Kingdom as a State under international law<\/a><\/strong>; Professor William Schabas from Middlesex University London, School of Law, and a renowned expert in international criminal law, who authored a Legal Opinion on War Crimes related to the United States belligerent occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom<\/a><\/strong>; and Professor Federico Lenzerini from the University of Siena, Italy, Department of Political and International Science, who authored Legal Opinion on the authority of the Council of Regency of the Hawaiian Kingdom<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both the Operational Plans for Transitioning the State of Hawai\u2018i into a Military Government<\/a><\/strong> and Transitioning the Military Government to the Hawaiian Kingdom Government<\/a><\/strong>, which will bring the prolonged American occupation to an end, is a culmination of years of research and exposure and is a subset of plans under phase II of the strategic plan. As such we are moving toward the end of phase II and preparing for phase III that will bring the 130-year crisis to an end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The two operational plans are clear as to where we are, where we need to get to, and the path to get there. The essential tasks and the implied tasks in each of the plans are measurable, and, most importantly, flexible when achieving the tasks. They allow flexibility to adjust to issues unforeseen such as time and allocation of resources. The Council of Regency established a 3-year window for the occupation to come to an end, but it doesn’t prevent unforeseen and extenuating circumstances to adjust the timeline. When the American occupation of Japan began in 1945, it was thought that it would last 3 years. But circumstances extended the occupation an additional 4 years. The same could happen in the Hawaiian situation, but the Council of Regency needed to set an initial timeline of 3 years.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When dealing with a 130-year crisis of a prolonged and illegal American occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom, planning is a crucial component that informs where we are today and where we want to be tomorrow. An operational plan is informed … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,8,5,6,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education","category-international-law","category-national","category-treaties","category-war-crimes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p31YBQ-1Ju","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6664"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6664\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6681,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6664\/revisions\/6681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}