{"id":3881,"date":"2017-01-02T23:22:40","date_gmt":"2017-01-02T23:22:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/?p=3881"},"modified":"2017-01-02T23:22:40","modified_gmt":"2017-01-02T23:22:40","slug":"the-smoking-gun-no-question-on-illegality-of-the-u-s-overthrow-of-the-hawaiian-government-in-1893","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/the-smoking-gun-no-question-on-illegality-of-the-u-s-overthrow-of-the-hawaiian-government-in-1893\/","title":{"rendered":"The Smoking Gun! No Question on Illegality of the U.S. Overthrow of the Hawaiian Government in 1893"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In 2016, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dukeupress.edu\/About\/index.php\" target=\"_blank\">Duke University Press<\/a> published Tom Coffman&#8217;s<em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dukeupress.edu\/nation-within\/?viewby=title\" target=\"_blank\">Nation Within: The History of the American Occupation of Hawai\u2018i<\/a><\/em>. While this book has been in circulation since 1998, it is the first time that an academic publisher has put its name to the book. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dukeupress.edu\/About\/mission.php\" target=\"_blank\">goal<\/a> of Duke University Press is &#8220;to contribute boldly to the international community of scholarship.&#8221; &#8220;By insisting on thorough peer review procedures in combination with careful editorial judgment, the Press performs an intellectual gatekeeping function, ensuring that only scholarship of the highest quality receives the imprimatur of the University.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-3883 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Coffmans-Nation-Within-478x700.jpg\" width=\"478\" height=\"700\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Coffmans-Nation-Within-478x700.jpg 478w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Coffmans-Nation-Within-768x1125.jpg 768w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Coffmans-Nation-Within-699x1024.jpg 699w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Coffmans-Nation-Within-205x300.jpg 205w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Coffmans-Nation-Within.jpg 1804w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 478px) 100vw, 478px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www2.hawaii.edu\/~anu\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">Dr. Keanu Sai<\/a>, a political scientist, whose doctoral research covered the American occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom and its continued existence today as an independent State, was asked by the <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hawaiianhistory.org\/publications\/journal\/\" target=\"_blank\">Hawaiian Journal of History<\/a><\/em> to write a <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.hawaii.edu\/~anu\/pdf\/sai_nationwithin.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">book review<\/a>\u00a0of Coffman&#8217;s <em>Nation Within<\/em> for its first publication in 2017. In his review, Dr. Sai reveals the &#8220;smoking gun&#8221; that was brought to his attention by <a href=\"http:\/\/manoa.hawaii.edu\/hshk\/people\/ronald-c-williams-jr\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dr. Ron Williams<\/a> of the University of Hawai\u2018i at Manoa.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">***************************************************************<\/p>\n<p>In <em>Nation Within: The History of the American Occupation of Hawai\u2018i, <\/em>Tom Coffman exhibits a radical shift by historians in interpreting political events post-1893. When Coffman first published his book in 1998, his title reflected a common misunderstanding of annexation. But in 2009, he revised the title by replacing the word <em>Annexation <\/em>with the word <em>Occupation<\/em>. Coffman admitted he made this change because of international law (p. xvi). By shifting the interpretive lens to international law, Coffman not only changed the view to occupation, but would also change the view of the government\u2019s overthrow in 1893. While the book lacks any explanation of applicable international laws, he does an excellent job of providing an easy reading of facts for international law to interpret.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-3887 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Nation-Within-98-700x458.jpg\" width=\"700\" height=\"458\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Nation-Within-98-700x458.jpg 700w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Nation-Within-98-768x502.jpg 768w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Nation-Within-98-1024x670.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Nation-Within-98-459x300.jpg 459w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Nation-Within-98.jpg 1523w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-3888\" src=\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Nation-Within-09.jpg\" width=\"569\" height=\"386\" \/><br \/>\nIn international law, there is a fundamental rule that diplomats have a duty to not intervene in the internal affairs of the sovereign State they are accredited to. Every sovereign State has a right \u201cto establish, alter, or abolish, its own municipal constitution [and] no foreign State can interfere with the exercise of this right\u201d (Halleck\u2019s International Law, 3rd ed., p. 94). For an ambassador, a violation of this rule would have grave consequences. An offended State could proceed \u201cagainst an ambassador as a public enemy\u2026if justice should be refused by his own sovereign\u201d (Wheaton\u2019s International Law, 8th ed., p. 301).<\/p>\n<p>John Stevens, the American ambassador to the Hawaiian Kingdom arrived in the islands in the summer of 1889. As Coffman notes, Stevens was already fixated with annexation when he \u201cwrote that the \u2018golden hour\u2019 for resolving the future status of Hawai\u2018i was at hand,\u201d (p. 114) and began to collude with Lorrin Thurston (p. 116). Thurston was not an American citizen but rather a third-generation Hawaiian subject. Stevens\u2019 opportunity to intervene and seek annexation would occur after Lili\u2018uokalani \u201cattempted to promulgate a new constitution, [which] was the event Thurston and Stevens had been waiting for\u201d (p. 120).<\/p>\n<p>On January 16, Stevens orders the landing of U.S. troops and \u201ctells Thurston that if the annexationists control three buildings\u2014\u2018Iolani Palace, Ali\u2018iolani Hale, and the Archives\u2014he will announce American recognition of the new government\u201d (p. 121). The following day, \u201cStevens tells the queen\u2019s cabinet that he will protect the annexationists if they are attacked or arrested by government police\u201d (Ibid.). However, unbeknownst to Stevens, the insurgents only took over Ali\u2018iolani Hale, which housed \u201cclerks of the Kingdom\u201d (p. 125). One of the insurgents, Samuel Damon, knowing Stevens\u2019 recognition was premature, sought to convince Lili\u2018uokalani that her resistance was futile because the United States had already recognized the new government, and that she should order Marshal Charles Wilson, head of the government police, to give up the police station. Wilson was planning an assault on the government building to apprehend the insurgents for treason in spite of the presence of U.S. troops.<\/p>\n<p>International law clearly interprets these events as intervention and Stevens to be a \u201cpublic enemy\u201d of the Hawaiian Kingdom. This was the same conclusion reached by President Grover Cleveland, whose investigation was an indictment of Stevens and the commander of the USS Boston, Captain Gilbert Wiltse. \u201cThe lawful Government of Hawai\u2018i was overthrown without the drawing of a sword or the firing of a shot,\u201d Cleveland said, \u201cby a process every step of which, it may be safely asserted, is directly traceable to and dependent for its success upon the agency of the United States acting through its diplomatic and naval representatives\u201d (p. 144). Because of diplomatic immunity, the United States, as the sending State, would be obliged to prosecute Stevens and Wiltse for treason under American law.<\/p>\n<p>On December 20, 1893, a resolution of the U.S. Senate called for a separate investigation to be conducted by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. Chaired by Senator John Morgan, a vocal annexationist, the purpose of the Senate investigation was to repudiate Cleveland\u2019s investigation and to vindicate Stevens and Wiltse of criminal liability. One week later, the Committee held its first day of hearings in Washington, DC. Stevens appeared before the Committee and fielded questions under oath on January 20, 1894. When asked by the Chairman if his recognition of the provisional government was for the \u201cpurpose of dethroning the Queen,\u201d he responded, \u201cNot the slightest\u2014absolute noninterference was my purpose\u201d (Report from the Committee on Foreign Relations\u2014 Appendix, p. 550).<\/p>\n<p>After the hearings, two reports were submitted on February 26, 1894\u2014a Committee Report and a Minority Report. The committee of eight senators was split down the middle, with Morgan giving the majority vote for the Committee Report. Half of the committee members did not believe Stevens\u2019 testimony of his non-intervention. The Minority Report stated, \u201cWe can not concur\u2026in so much of the foregoing report as exonerates the minister of the United States, Mr. Stevens, from active officious and unbecoming participation in the events which led to the revolution\u201d (Ibid., p. xxxv).<\/p>\n<p>The Senate Committee\u2019s investigation could find no direct evidence that would disprove Stevens\u2019 sworn testimony, but in 2016, the \u201csmoking gun\u201d was found that would prove Stevens was a public enemy of the Hawaiian Kingdom, committed perjury before the Committee, and would no doubt have been prosecuted under the 1790 federal statute of treason. The Hawaiian Mission Houses Archives is processing a collection of documents given to them by a descendent of William O. Smith. Smith was an insurgent that served as the attorney general for Sanford Dole, so-called president of the provisional government.<\/p>\n<p>The \u201csmoking gun\u201d is a note to Dole signed by Stevens marked \u201cprivate\u201d and written under the letterhead of the \u201cUnited States Legation\u201d in Honolulu and dated January 17, 1893. Stevens writes, \u201cJudge Dole: I would advise not to make known of my recognition of the de facto Provisional Government until said Government is in possession of the police station.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As a political scientist, Coffman\u2019s book is a welcomed addition to arresting revisionist history.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-3884 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Stevens-to-Dole-Jan.-17-1893-654x700.jpg\" width=\"654\" height=\"700\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Stevens-to-Dole-Jan.-17-1893-654x700.jpg 654w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Stevens-to-Dole-Jan.-17-1893-280x300.jpg 280w, https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Stevens-to-Dole-Jan.-17-1893.jpg 756w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 654px) 100vw, 654px\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In 2016, Duke University Press published Tom Coffman&#8217;s Nation Within: The History of the American Occupation of Hawai\u2018i. While this book has been in circulation since 1998, it is the first time that an academic publisher has put its name &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/the-smoking-gun-no-question-on-illegality-of-the-u-s-overthrow-of-the-hawaiian-government-in-1893\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education","category-international-law"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p31YBQ-10B","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3881"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3881\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3889,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3881\/revisions\/3889"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}