{"id":3443,"date":"2015-11-20T20:17:14","date_gmt":"2015-11-20T20:17:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/?p=3443"},"modified":"2015-11-22T02:45:12","modified_gmt":"2015-11-22T02:45:12","slug":"international-arbitration-larsen-vs-hawaiian-kingdom-1999-2001","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/international-arbitration-larsen-vs-hawaiian-kingdom-1999-2001\/","title":{"rendered":"International Arbitration: Larsen vs. Hawaiian Kingdom (1999-2001)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Many people are not familiar with dispute resolution under international law and the role the Permanent Court of Arbitration<\/a> (PCA) plays in international relations.<\/p>\n

\"Peace<\/p>\n

When the first International Peace Conference was convened in July 1899 in The Hague, Netherlands, the major States of the world were in attendance. Its first treaty\u2014Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes<\/em>, established a global institution for international dispute settlement called the Permanent Court of Arbitration. This international court predates the Permanent Court of International Justice<\/a> established by the League of Nations from 1922-1946 and its successor the International Court of Justice<\/a> (ICJ) established by the United Nations from 1946-present.<\/p>\n

The PCA is not your conventional court that has permanent sitting judges, but rather it has a permanent secretariat called the International Bureau, which is headed by a Secretary General. After the PCA accepts disputes from parties, the Bureau facilitates the establishment of ad hoc<\/em> Tribunals in order to resolve the disputes depending on the arbitration agreement between the parties and the applicable rules. The fundamental difference between a court with judges and a tribunal with arbitrators is that the arbitrators are selected by the parties based on their expertise in the area of the dispute. Judges may not be experts in areas of the dispute and therefore there is a need to rely on expert witnesses. Arbitration alleviates that requirement because the arbitrators themselves are the experts.<\/p>\n

The PCA was initially limited to disputes between States that involved matters of public international law as well as arbitrating disputes over territorial sovereignty. By the 1930s, the PCA expanded its jurisdiction to include private parties that had a dispute with a State. One of these first cases involved a dispute between Radio Corporation of America, a private party, and China, being the State (RCA vs. China<\/a>). Today, the jurisdiction of the PCA include disputes: (1) between two or more States; (2) a State and an international organization; (3) two or more international organizations; (4) a State and a private party; and (5) an international organization and a private party.<\/p>\n

In 1999, a dispute arose between the Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom and a Hawaiian subject over the unlawful imposition of American laws in Hawaiian territory. The Hawaiian subject, Lance Larsen, was convicted under American laws and was incarcerated for 30 days, 7 of which were in solitary confinement. Mr. Larsen\u2019s attorney, Ms. Ninia Parks, alleged that the Hawaiian Government was \u201cnegligent\u201d by not taking affirmative steps to prevent the imposition of American laws in the Hawaiian Kingdom. She also alleged that the Hawaiian Government was a violation of its 1849 Treaty with the United States<\/a>. Article 8 of the treaty states, \u201cand each of the two contracting parties engage that the citizens or subjects of the other residing in their respective States shall enjoy their property and personal security, in as full and ample manner of their own citizens or subjects, of the subjects or citizens of the most favored nation, but subject always to the laws and statutes of the two countries respectively.\u201d<\/p>\n

After negotiations in Honolulu, an arbitration agreement was reached and on November 8, 1999, it was submitted to the PCA for acceptance. The arbitration agreement provided the allegations:<\/p>\n

\u201c(a) Lance Paul Larsen, a Hawaiian subject, alleges that the Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom is in continual violation of its 1849 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation with the United States of America, and in violation of the principles of international law laid [down] in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, by allowing the unlawful imposition of American municipal laws over claimant\u2019s person within the territorial jurisdiction of the Hawaiian Kingdom; and <\/em><\/p>\n

(b) Lance Paul Larsen, a Hawaiian subject, alleges that the Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom is also in continual violation of the principles of international comity by allowing the unlawful imposition of American municipal laws over the claimant\u2019s person within the territorial jurisdiction of the Hawaiian Kingdom.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\"Tjaco_van_den_Hout\"As part of the International Bureau\u2019s due diligence into the status of the Hawaiian Kingdom as an independent State under international law, the PCA\u2019s Secretary General Van Den Hout made a formal recommendation to David Keanu Sai, Agent for the Hawaiian Government, to provide a formal invitation to the United States to join in the arbitration proceedings. This would have one of three outcomes\u2014first<\/em>, the United States would dispute the existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom as a State and the PCA would terminate the proceedings, second<\/em>, it could join the arbitration in order to answer Larsen\u2019s allegations of violating his rights that led to his incarceration, or, third<\/em>, it could refuse to join in the arbitration, but allow it to go forward.<\/p>\n

\"John_Crook\"In a conference call held in Washington, D.C., on March 3, 2000, \"Niniabetween Mr. John Crook, United States Assistant Legal Adviser for United Nations Affairs, Ms. Parks and Mr. Sai, the United States was formally invited to join in the arbitration. It wasn\u2019t until a couple of weeks later that the United States Embassy in The Hague notified the PCA that the United States will not join in the arbitration, but asked permission of the Hawaiian Government and Mr. Larsen\u2019s attorney to have access to all pleadings, transcripts and records. The United States took the third<\/em> option and did not deny the existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom as a State.<\/p>\n

After the PCA verified and recognized that the Hawaiian Kingdom did exist as a State under international law with a legitimate government and that Larsen is a Hawaiian subject, steps were then taken to form the Tribunal. Mr. Keoni Agard, Esquire<\/em>, was appointed by Ms. Parks, on behalf of Mr. Larsen, and the Hawaiian Government to serve as the Appointing Authority to work with the PCA in order to secure the appointment of three arbitrators. As the Appointing Authority, Mr. Agard was given a list of arbitrators provided by the PCA for each of the parties to select. The Hawaiian Government selected Professor Christopher Greenwood, QC, and Ms. Parks selected Dr. Gavan Griffith, QC. These two arbitrators then recommended the appointment of a Presiding Arbitrator, Professor James Crawford, SC, which both parties agreed to.<\/p>\n

\"Larsen<\/p>\n

The Hawaiian arbitration fell under the PCA\u2019s jurisdiction as a dispute between a \u201cState and a private party.\u201d The dispute was not about the existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom as a State under international law, but rather centered solely on whether Larsen could sue the Hawaiian Government for negligence by allowing American laws to be imposed in the Hawaiian Kingdom that caused his incarceration. The Tribunal stated to the parties that in this dispute the United States is a necessary party in order for Mr. Larsen to maintain his suit against the Hawaiian Government. The procedural questions that were given to the parties to answer in its written pleadings is whether or not these proceedings can continue without the participation of the United States. The Tribunal cited three international court cases that came before the ICJ and focused on necessary third parties as the precedence\u2014Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943<\/a><\/em> (Italy v. France, United Kingdom and the United States), East Timor<\/a><\/em> (Portugal v. Australia), and Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru<\/a><\/em> (Nauru v. Australia).<\/p>\n

\"PCA_Sai\"After written pleadings were submitted, oral hearings were held at The Hague on December 7, 8, and 11, 2000, and the Arbitration Award was filed with the PCA on February 5, 2001. The court concluded that the United States was a necessary third party and without their participation in the arbitration proceedings, Mr. Larsen\u2019s allegations of negligence against the Hawaiian Government could not move forward.<\/p>\n

A common misunderstanding was that the dispute between Mr. Larsen and the Hawaiian Government centered on whether the Hawaiian Kingdom continues to exist as a State. It was not. The PCA recognized the continued existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom as a State because the United States, who claimed to have sovereignty over the Hawaiian Islands, did not refute the continued existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom when it had an opportunity to do so. The only claim that the United States had over the Hawaiian Islands was through American legislation and not a treaty. The PCA is very much aware that international law only allows annexation by treaty and not through a State\u2019s municipal legislation.<\/p>\n

Of significance in these international arbitration proceedings is that the Tribunal in its Arbitration Award acknowledged \u201cthat in the nineteenth century the Hawaiian Kingdom existed as an independent State recognized as such by the United States of America, the United Kingdom and various other States,\u201d and the PCA recognized the continued existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom as a State in the twenty-first century.<\/p>\n

To see the PCA\u2019s explicit recognition of the Hawaiian Kingdom as a State go to the PCA Case Repository of Lance Larsen vs. The Hawaiian Kingdom<\/a><\/em>, and scroll down to name of respondent, \u201cThe Hawaiian Kingdom (State),\u201d who is represented by \u201cMr. David Keanu Sai, Agent, Mr. Peter Umialiloa Sai, First deputy agent, Mr. Gary Victor Dubin, Second deputy agent and counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Many people are not familiar with dispute resolution under international law and the role the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) plays in international relations. When the first International Peace Conference was convened in July 1899 in The Hague, Netherlands, the … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-international-law","category-treaties"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p31YBQ-Tx","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3443"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3443\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3452,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3443\/revisions\/3452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}