![\"cambridge-logo\"](\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/cambridge-logo.png\"){kind=logo}
From September 10-12, 2015, fifteen academic scholars from around the world who were political scientists and historians came together to present papers\u00a0on non-European powers at a conference\/workshop held at the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. Attendees of the conference were by invitation only and the papers presented at the conference are planned to be published in a volume with Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n
The theme of the conference was Non-European Powers in the Age of Empire<\/a>. These non-European countries included\u00a0Hawai\u2018i, Iran, Turkey, China, Ethiopia,\u00a0Japan, Korea, Thailand, and Madagascar.\u00a0Dr. Keanu Sai was one of the invited academic scholars and his paper is titled “Hawaiian Neutrality: From the Crimean Conflict through the Spanish-American War<\/a>.”<\/p>\n Many of these scholars were unaware of the history of the Hawaiian Kingdom and its “full” membership in the family of nations as a sovereign and independent state. What stood out for them was the continued existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom because it was only the government that was illegally overthrown by the United States and not the Hawaiian state, which is the international term for country. The belief that Hawai\u2018i lost its independence was dispelled and that its current status is a state\u00a0under a prolonged American occupation since the Spanish-American War.<\/p>\n What was a surprise was that the Hawaiian Kingdom was the only non-European Power to have been a co-equal sovereign to European Powers throughout the 19th century. All other non-European Powers were not recognized as full sovereign states until the latter part of the 19th century and the turn of the 20th century. During this time European Powers imposed their laws within the territory of these countries under what has been termed “unequal treaties<\/a>.”<\/p>\n Since 1858, Japan had been forced to recognize the extraterritoriality of American, British, French, Dutch and Russian law operating within Japanese territory. According to\u00a0these treaties, citizens of these countries while in Japan could only be prosecuted under their country’s laws and by their country’s Consulates in Japan called “Consular Courts<\/a>.” Under Article VI of the 1858 American-Japanese Treaty<\/a>, it provided that \u201cAmericans committing offenses against Japanese shall be tried in American consular courts, and when guilty shall be punished according to American law.\u201d\u00a0The Hawaiian Kingdom\u2019s 1871 treaty<\/a> with Japan also had this provision, where it states under Article II that Hawaiian subjects in Japan shall enjoy \u201cat all times the same privileges as may have been, or may hereafter be granted to the citizens or subjects of any other nation.\u201d\u00a0This was a sore point for Japanese authorities who felt Japan\u2019s sovereignty should be fully recognized by these states.<\/p>\n \u201cHer Hawaiian Majesty\u2019s Government reposing entire confidence in the laws of Japan and the administration of justice in the Empire, and desiring to testify anew their sentiments of cordial goodwill and friendship towards the Government of His Majesty the Emperor of Japan, have resolved to abandon the jurisdiction hitherto exercised by them in Japan.<\/p>\n It therefore becomes my agreeable duty to announce to your Excellency, in pursuance of instructions from Her Majesty’s Government, and I now have the honour formally to announce, that the Hawaiian Government do fully, completely, and finally abandon and relinquish the jurisdiction acquired by them in respect of Hawaiian subjects and property in Japan, under the Treaty of the 19th August, 1871.<\/p>\n There are at present from fifteen to twenty Hawaiian subjects residing in this Empire, and in addition about twenty-five subjects of Her Majesty visit Japan annually. Any information in my possession regarding these persons, or any of them, is at all times at your Excellency’s disposal.<\/p>\n While this action is taken spontaneously and without condition, as a measure demanded by the situation, I permit myself to express the confident hope entertained by Her Majesty’s Government that this step will remove the chief if not the only obstacle standing in the way of the free circulation of Her Majesty’s subjects throughout the Empire, for the purposes of business and pleasure in the same manner as is permitted to foreigners in other countries where Consular jurisdiction does not prevail. But in the accomplishment of this logical result of the extinction of Consular jurisdiction, whether by the conclusion of a new Treaty or otherwise, Her Majesty’s Government are most happy to consult the convenience and pleasure of His Imperial Majesty’s Government.”<\/p>\n On April 10, 1894, Foreign Minister Munemitsu, responded, \u201cThe sentiments of goodwill and friendship which inspired the act of abandonment are highly appreciated by the Imperial Government, but circumstances which it is now unnecessary to recapitulate have prevented an earlier acknowledgment of you Excellency\u2019s note.\u201d<\/p>\n This dispels the commonly held belief among historians that Great Britain was the first state to\u00a0abandon its extraterritorial jurisdiction in Japan under the Anglo-Japanese Treaty of Commerce and Navigation<\/a>, which was signed on July 16, 1894. The action taken by the Hawaiian Kingdom did serve as \u201cprecedent for the Western powers to follow.\u201d<\/p>\n Dr. Sai encourages everyone to read his paper “Hawaiian Neutrality: From the Crimean Conflict through the Spanish-American War<\/a>”\u00a0that was\u00a0presented at Cambridge, which covers Hawai\u2018i’s political history from the celebrated King Kamehameha I to the current state of affairs today, and the remedy to ultimately bring the prolonged occupation to an end.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" From September 10-12, 2015, fifteen academic scholars from around the world who were political scientists and historians came together to present papers\u00a0on non-European powers at a conference\/workshop held at the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. Attendees of the conference were … Continue reading ![\"Cambridge](\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/Cambridge-Conference-Attendees-2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Emperor](\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/Emperor-Meiji.jpg\")
While\u00a0King Kalakaua was visiting\u00a0Japan in 1881, Emperor\u00a0Meiji \u201casked for Hawai\u2018i to grant full recognition to Japan and thereby create a precedent for the Western powers to follow.\u201d Kalakaua was unable to grant the Emperor’s request, but it was done by his successor Queen Lili\u2018uokalani. Hawaiian recognition of Japan\u2019s full sovereignty and repeal of the Hawaiian Kingdom\u2019s consular jurisdiction in Japan provided in the Hawaiian-Japanese Treaty of 1871, would take place in 1893 by executive agreement<\/a> through exchange of notes<\/a>.<\/p>\n![\"Lili\u2018uokalani_3\"](\"https:\/\/hawaiiankingdom.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/Lili\u2018uokalani_3-478x700.jpg\")
By direction of Her Majesty Queen Lili\u2018uokalani, R.W. Irwin, Hawaiian Minister to the Court of Japan in Tokyo sent a diplomatic note to Mutsu Munemitsu, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs on January 18, 1893 announcing the Hawaiian Kingdom’s abandonment of consular jurisdiction. Irwin stated:<\/p>\n